EDOUARD DECAEN
CLAIR-ESTELLE GONNET
SOPHIE SUOS
ARTHUR DOUWES
Subject : Wikis,Wikipedia, Wikileaks
Wikipedia is a free online user based encyclopedia, its contents are edited by non professional volonteers, and entirely free, although donation sustained, it covers all domains, and is the biggest, though maybe not the most accurate, encyclopedia avaible nowadays.
Wikileaks is a website intended to give anyone the ability to share information with total anonyma, and by this mean allow confidential or sensible information to be shared throughout the world.
Both of them are wikis-based, that is for say, they contain mostly pages modifiable by users.
Comprehensive, easy to use, polyglot, although not always accurate, wiki based sites are already essential, extensively used, and will probably spread their influence even further in the future, to the expense of other medias.
1 What is a very commun moto among wikipedia editors wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
2 What is the difference between Wikipedia and Wikileaks?
CLAIR-ESTELLE GONNET
SOPHIE SUOS
ARTHUR DOUWES
Subject : Wikis,Wikipedia, Wikileaks
Wikipedia is a free online user based encyclopedia, its contents are edited by non professional volonteers, and entirely free, although donation sustained, it covers all domains, and is the biggest, though maybe not the most accurate, encyclopedia avaible nowadays.
Wikileaks is a website intended to give anyone the ability to share information with total anonyma, and by this mean allow confidential or sensible information to be shared throughout the world.
Both of them are wikis-based, that is for say, they contain mostly pages modifiable by users.
Comprehensive, easy to use, polyglot, although not always accurate, wiki based sites are already essential, extensively used, and will probably spread their influence even further in the future, to the expense of other medias.
1 What is a very commun moto among wikipedia editors wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
2 What is the difference between Wikipedia and Wikileaks?
3. Is Wikipedia reliable ? http://www.dummies.com/how-to/
The creators of Wikipedia are the first to admit that not every entry is accurate and that it might not be the best source of material for research papers. Here are some
4 comparative study
4 Explain how wikipedia have an influence on the world, based on this article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/
4 Explain how wikipedia have an influence on the world, based on this article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/
German courts allow the suppression of a criminal’s name in news accounts once he has paid his debt to society, a provision that is now pitted against the American First Amendment.
5 Who are the wiki users?
5 Are all the editors of wikipedia equal before the wikipedia system
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/
News about Wikipedia. Commentary and archival information about Wikipedia from The New York Times.
2/ The name Wikipedia comes from its creator's dog's name.
3/ Wikipedia contains more than 10 000 000 articles.
4/ You can make an article about you on Wikipedia.
5/ There is a copyright on each article of wikipedia.
Sorry, but I took out the obscenities at the end.
ReplyDeleteI'm all for "Freedom of Speech", but you forget that obscene words have real power. The power to insult, they are used to disrespect people. For you they may just be fun foreign words, but do not play around with them when you are dealing with native speakers of English.
To use them in a class assignment, (especially one published on the web!) is seen as form of disrespect.